» Migisi - In the wake of NIU
In response to Other things at work... posted by BrianTubbs:.
Quoting from:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?i...
"Why would CBS dare put such a show on broadcast TV? Why would CBS affiliates who care for one minute about "community standards" saturate their community with it? Dexter is not an "antihero." He's a complete psychopath, a negation of humanity, a walking black hole. But they find the whole specter to be an opportunity for cuteness: Pin the phony smile on the killer. The viewer is encouraged to see the world through Dexter's blank eyes; to share his smirky contempt for his clueless police co-workers as he buys the office donuts; to enjoy him playing a judgmental God as he saws into his guilty victims while they're still alive.
.
"There is no dispute. The show is meant to cause sympathy for a serial killer."
.
-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - In the wake of NIU
In response to In the wake of NIU posted by Migisi:
.
Sounds like the stories I've heard about the cops in Rio.
.
There are such animules.
.
-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Agree, Migisi
» Migisi - Agree, Migisi
In response to Agree, Migisi posted by BrianTubbs:
.
I'm a fan of the CSI shows (not so much for CSI Miami), Law and Order, etc. The Dexter producers are merely trying to hook CSI fans like me by setting Dexter in a CSI role. I watched, but never again.
.
Again, quoting from:
http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?i...
"The drama is based in Miami, where lovable Dexter satisfies his taste for pork sandwiches and his blood lust for long, drawn-out dismemberment. During the day, he works as a police specialist, examining the blood spatter at crime scenes. At night, he spends his time preparing his next victim. Showtime (and now CBS) believes they have enough "moral ambiguity" in the series because he only kills other serial killers. He's a toxic avenger.
.
"It's one thing to put this blackened filet of soul on a pay-cable channel. It's another thing entirely to take it and paste it on one of the Big Three broadcast channels."
-- posted by Migisi
» redback - Migisi's right
In response to Migisi's right posted by Migisi:
I'm not in here as often at the moment. You have probably gone past this issue but it caught my eye.
Despite gun availability, we NEVER heard about anyone bringing guns to school and killing people. But then again, kids weren't being drugged up like they are today. As I see it, the mental health 'industry' should be held accountable. But, as usual, money talks.
Like the guns, the medications have also been around a long time. There are poor prescribing practices and ineffective therapies, poor patient compliance...some research indicating it is well below what is believed, lazy diagnoses eg ADD and the problematic Ritalin. But is there any evidence there's a new batch of problematic medications on the US market...destined for broader distribution under the "free" trade agreements? Is any one medication rearing its ugly head? Children and Ritalin stands out...but ritalin and massacre?
Research also indicates a significant % of kids needing these prescription drugs also rely on the naughty stuff...counter-acting medications.
There is a perception it is predominantly an USA phenomenon. After all, "the American-style shooting" that happened in Finland
http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5ibdL...
seems less newsworthy to us than what happens in the USA.
Here's an interesting time line to 2006:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/sep...
I wouldn't have thought it a complete list to 2006 but it sure seems some adults lead by bad example.
I think the more responsible members of the mental health industry need to be more aggressive in tackling preventative measures rather than "early intervention" ONLY after the crisis.
-- posted by redback
» pink101 - On A Toot
In response to Migisi's right posted by redback:
.
Is any one medication rearing its ugly head? Children and Ritalin stands out...but ritalin and massacre?
.
Try Prozac.
.
I do some little things for a couple of veterans--one a Viet Nam Vet.
.
Something happened to him while he was serving in 'Nam--maybe he saw too many magots in and on the dead bodies he encountered?
.
Anyway, when he came back, he eventually ended up in medical school studying to be an Osteopathic Physician. He made it all the way through school and graduated with his degree except he needed to do an internship before being qualified to practice on his own. That's when he got nailed for ordering prescriptions for narcotic drugs for his own use. And, while he was in a recovery program he did it again. Bam! His case hit the newspapers and he was drummed out of medicine for good.
.
Now he is a street person on Prozac administered to him by the V.A.. He swings from being a very nice and gentle person all the way to the other extreme. He can be scary to be around him when he's off on a toot.
.
I agree with you that the pharmaceuticals should be held liable. Aren't the gun manufacturers held responsible?
.
-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - Reply to Red
In response to Migisi's right posted by redback:-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - Send your kid to college??
.-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - "Drug-free school zones"??
.-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - "Drug-free school zones"??
In response to "Drug-free school zones"?? posted by Migisi:
.
I remember when pot was the scourge.
.
Maybe it was the best of all choices including booze.
.
-- posted by pink101
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.