Protestantism

© Brian Tubbs

God and Evil

  1. Brian Tubbs


Reply   Post   Top
1.   Jan 23, 2008 1:12 PM

» Feature Writer Brian Tubbs - Washington and Communion

In response to Fraternity posted by pink101:


We're way off topic here, but oh well, what else is new? happy

As to Washington, it's agreed that he frequently (most of the time, in fact) skipped Communion from the Revolutionary War period onward - including during his presidency. I'm not disputing that. What Lillback points out is that it's an incorrect exaggeration to say that he "NEVER" took Communion after the Revolution - which is what several biographers have asserted.

But on Washington's skipping of Communion, there are several possible explanations - only ONE of which involves a questioning of his faith. The most likely explanation for GW's skipping Communion during the Revolution is that he was uncomfortable taking Communion from the official Church of England. During the Revolutionary period, the Anglicans in the U.S. separated and became Episcopalians, of course, and it appears he did - occasionally - take Communion after that.

Another possibility (also a very compelling one) is that GW became LESS committed to strict Anglican/Episcopalian denominational lines after the split with England. From the Revolutionary period onward, Washington entertained friendships with and attended services under clergy from other denominations. (There's even a rumor - unsubstantiated, of course - that he became a Baptist during the war).

Last, Washington may have avoided Communion because of sin in his life. Paul talks about examining oneself to see if you are worthy to partake of the Lord's Table. Perhaps GW felt guilty over some sin (infatuation with Sally Fairfax? slavery? who knows?). There IS some indication that GW, during the Revolutionary period, really began to wrestle with slavery.

I don't know why GW's custom of taking Communion became much less frequent during the Revolutionary period (and continued to be infrequent thereafter). But to jump from that historical fact to concluding he was a "Deist" is too far of a leap. The evidence doesn't support that.

Suite101
Feature Writer Brian Tubbs
Feature Writer for Protestantism


Post this Discussion Post to facebook Add this Discussion Post to del.icio.us! Digg this Discussion Post furl this Discussion Post Add this Discussion Post to Reddit Add this Discussion Post to Technorati Add this Discussion Post to Newsvine Add this Discussion Post to Windows Live Add this Discussion Post to Yahoo Add this Discussion Post to StumbleUpon Add this Discussion Post to BlinkLists Add this Discussion Post to Spurl Add this Discussion Post to Google Add this Discussion Post to Ask Add this Discussion Post to Squidoo


Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.