» paper_turtle - & bouncers, too
-- posted by paper_turtle
» Migisi - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by paper_turtle:-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by paper_turtle:-- posted by pink101
» paper_turtle - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by Migisi:
Yes, some churches lock up when no one is supposed to be in the building, BUT my friend's church is locking up while people are inside gathered for worship. And don't forget the bouncer, there to physically enforce the peace.
Where I live (more or less in the boonies) most churches are *always* open, or at least are open from sunup to sundown, whether or not there's any church function going on.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
» paper_turtle - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by pink101:
It may or may not be proper for a church to lock its doors and to place strongmen throughout the congregation to protect the assembly from violence; but, it is understandable.
.
Understandable, *maybe,* but to my mind TOTALLY counter to what Jesus would have done.
.
Did Jesus hire bodyguards when he knew his life was in danger? Did he use force when he was arrested? Did he force anyone to do anything?
.
A Christian believes in an afterlife. Although the details of the nature of this afterlife may differ, all believe that the next phase of existence is "a better place" than this world. The early Christians welcomed death as a testament to their faith.
.
Where is the faith of one who must resort to violence in the house of the Lord?
.
And what, do you think, might be a more constructive approach?
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
» pink101 - You Are Correct
In response to & bouncers, too posted by paper_turtle:-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by paper_turtle:-- posted by Migisi
» paper_turtle - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by Migisi:
I suppose this in incredibly radical of me, and perhaps some will see it as romantic dreaming, but IMO churches would do more to counter such incidents if they engaged in some deep self-examination. Just what causes a person to decide to go on a vioment rampage? It it not, at its root because this person is wounded, and feels unloved, alienated? And (speaking generally) doesn't the shooter most often go after those who he feels have wronged him in some way?
.
Seems to my guarding the church as a means of keeping the peace of the sanctuary is just another way of avoiding taking responsibility. And it says, "MY safety is of more value than anyone else's."
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
» paper_turtle - You Are Correct
In response to You Are Correct posted by pink101:
I see what you're saying about supernationalists. And to a certain extent I agree. But I tend to think its all about fear. The Nazis came into power by presenting themselves as a means of alleviating the fear caused by WW I and its aftermath. And they maintained an iron hold over the people through fear. Any time the fear button is pushed people--literallly--loose their minds, at least temporarily.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
PS--Dawn? Who's Dawn? ;)
PT
-- posted by paper_turtle
» Migisi - & bouncers, too
In response to & bouncers, too posted by paper_turtle:-- posted by Migisi
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.