Protestantism

» _Boanerges_ - Who is to judge?

In response to Heh heh heh posted by pink101:
apparently you!...
as for me.. I have no problem with seperating from those to whom I cannot agree with, or simply cannot get along with.. I have no problem with that at all..
yet.. as is painfully obvious.. I do endure those who I dismiss, for the sake of unity.. now - thats about as fair as it comes..
and .. if YOU don't like that, whats that to me.... life keeps rollin down the road....
but.. I ain't mad at ya..
now then, you should get back to the constant vanity of opposing something - Christianity exclusively - while maintaining nothing to stand for.. I'll get back to my video making.

Peace should come if we just avoid each other until a real need arises ....

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» pink101 - Who is to judge?

In response to Who is to judge? posted by _Boanerges_:

.
I'm sure you will be impressed by the video series on the Corporation. Check it out, Wendell. It has 23 parts that are able to be seen there on YouTube, or you can buy the complete video on DVD.

-- posted by pink101

» Brian Tubbs - Don't think I'm bashing

In response to but I'm sorry...?... posted by _Boanerges_:

I don't think I'm bashing you, Wendell. I just don't agree with you on Huckabee and the conspiracy stuff (most of it, anyway).

As for biblical prophecy....yes, I believe our world is heading toward one-world government, which is very much in line with what the Bible portends. But, so many times, Christians have made specific predictions and/or associations regarding prophecy, "end times," etc. - and have come out looking foolish. (Not saying you are foolish).

An example is a guest evangelist that came through a church I attended in my teen years. He did all kinds of calculations based on Daniel, Revelation, world history, etc. - and preached a msg titled "Why 1992 will be the Last Presidential Election." Obviously, his calculations were a little........off.

I grew up in ultra-fundamentalist circles, and I got completely and totally burned out on end times prophecy stuff. The fact is that NONE OF US knows when the end times are going to be. What good does it do for us to try to figure that out? It's in God's hands. I'll leave it there.

» _Boanerges_ - I felt is as such

In response to Don't think I'm bashing posted by BrianTubbs:

I don't think I'm bashing you, Wendell.
Sorry brian.. But I feel as if it is a cheap shot...

I just don't agree with you on Huckabee and the conspiracy stuff (most of it, anyway).

#1 Concerning Huck. I serious feel that you DID NOT read the article link provided.

#2 There is no THEORY here. Based on the evidence provided, its not only a CONFIRMED consipracy, but also you can add the words: collusion and secret. So Brian, there are NO CONSPIRACIES in the facts of the article. to make such a claim is ridiculous.

But, so many times, Christians have made specific predictions and/or associations regarding prophecy, "end times," etc. - and have come out looking foolish. (Not saying you are foolish).

jeez Brian... this has NOTHING to do with the article link, so.. I do not understand why you are even mentioning all of this (an exercise in vexation and vain stirring).

An example is a guest evangelist that came through a church I attended in my teen years. He did all kinds of calculations based on Daniel, Revelation, world history, etc. - and preached a msg titled "Why 1992 will be the Last Presidential Election." Obviously, his calculations were a little........off.

.......see above response...

I grew up in ultra-fundamentalist circles, and I got completely and totally burned out on end times prophecy stuff. The fact is that NONE OF US knows when the end times are going to be. What good does it do for us to try to figure that out? It's in God's hands. I'll leave it there.

#1 I'm not concerned with your past, here in this particular conversation. You should have avoided this entirely, if what you have a distaste for, will cause divisions within believers.

That is why I mentioned Romans 14. I felt a quick review would spell out my thoughts on this exchange, now which seems to include Phil's unrelated remarks. In other words, the topic thread title here is: Presidential Vote 08 and IS NOT related to the subject of Christianity.

#2 You are INDEED WRONG sir. You are to be aware of times and seasons. Look it up.

I should not be the one retorting this to you, Brian. The reason is simple. As I have told you before, you are a pastor, and as such carry authority. In that - I respect such position - even though you are not my pastor. Yet - such a position is TO BE respected - and as such - and ALL true believers SHOULD understand exactly what I am saying. Because of this, I do not understand why you would come at in such a blatant way. A word to the wise is sufficient.

Watch now as the hole that was dug will now become exploited and for this, is why I say - avoid my responses next time then! If you do not want me to post here any longer (which I know is not the case) and voice my opinion, then understand that I linger here by a thin thread as it is.

Please do not ridicule me publicly again. If you feel you did not do this, then please consider MY OPINION that you did (it came off as such TO ME)...

I moving forward in the expectation that you did not realize the harshness of your response and my distaste for it, especially coming from a person that should be respected and held up.

This now ends my soapbox......... No harm is done.

A word to the wise is sufficient.

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» pink101 - I felt is as such

In response to I felt is as such posted by _Boanerges_:

.
Egotism is such a sad commentary on how people can relate.
.
Here is an example of a spirit, Migisi. Are you able to sense it?
.
A spirit is not a person; but, it represents an aspect or aura of a person.
.

.

-- posted by pink101

» Migisi - I felt is as such

In response to I felt is as such posted by _Boanerges_:
.
Presidential Vote 08 and IS NOT related to the subject of Christianity.
.
Oh how I wish that was true.

-- posted by Migisi

» Migisi - I felt is as such

In response to I felt is as such posted by pink101:

.
A spirit is not a person; but, it represents an aspect or aura of a person.
.
Thunder is just a loud noise. Thunder's son is too. Tee hee.

-- posted by Migisi

» Brian Tubbs - Huckabee on Sovereignty

In response to I felt is as such posted by _Boanerges_:

Wendell,

I disagree that Mike Huckabee plans to lead the nation toward a globalist new world order. I did skim the article, and will need to do more research on Mr. Haas. I can't speak for all of Huckabee's donors and advisers. My focus is on what Huckabee himself supports. And Huckabee clearly supports US sovereignty.

http://www.nationalledger.com/cgi-bin/ar...

http://www.thenewhampshireprimary.com/ne...

And in his own words....

"My administration will never surrender any of our sovereignty, which is why I was the first presidential candidate to oppose ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty, which would endanger both our national security and our economic interests." ("America's Priorities in the War on Terror": Foreign Affairs Jan 1, 2008)

And...

"I don't want to ever give up one ounce of US sovereignty." (from a Fox News December 2007 interview)

» Brian Tubbs - Personal note

In response to I felt is as such posted by _Boanerges_:

Wendell,

I have mixed feelings about our exchange. I've spent a great deal of time researching the candidates, and didn't come to my support of Mike Huckabee lightly. So, when someone (whoever it may be) calls him a "fascist" (and that's a very loaded term, however you may have meant it - it's very provocative), that is something I find objectionable.

Be that as it may, though, I don't want to rehash all this. I consider you a friend, and certainly didn't intend to take a "cheap shot" or attack you personally or anything like that.

» _Boanerges_ - Personal note

In response to Personal note posted by BrianTubbs:

note taken...

well.. my time here has come to an end...

best wishes..

-- posted by _Boanerges_