« Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next »
» pink101 - Rabbi explains Shekina
In response to Rabbi explains Shekina posted by Migisi:-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - Tis ...Tis... This
In response to Tis ...Tis... This posted by redback:-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - Rabbi explains Shekina
In response to Rabbi explains Shekina posted by pink101:-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - Rabbi explains Shekina
In response to Rabbi explains Shekina posted by Migisi:
.
Check out Rabbi Isaac Luria the man who founded Lurianic Judaism.
.
You can put his name and Shekina in your search engine.
.
You will be rewarded.
.
-- posted by pink101
» redback - Bible101
In response to Bible101 posted by BrianTubbs:
Hi Brian...I'm not the one video challenged...but my computer is. For some reason, the video stops and starts a half word or half frame at a time...gives up entirely before the sentence is out...before 20% of the video has run. If I wait too long to see if it then works (I'm on dial-up) I get booted off the internet.
So, when I persevere here, I aint exaggerating! ![]()
When we look to an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent God...it's not clear why we have to divvy Him up into 3 parts for that to make better sense...and do that without diluting the sense of each omni and the global omnis.
You're suggesting Ravi does a better job in this than Francis, so I'll persevere.
-- posted by redback
» redback - Tis ...Tis... This
In response to Tis ...Tis... This posted by Migisi:Jeff: "There can be countless manifestations of God but Biblically they all slip into the 'one true version' of a paternalistic sole God...God must be male."
Migisi: "That would depend on whether one accepts that version."
I was alluding to the Christian God the Father, God the Son...within contemporary Bibles and not to any version I may prefer. Is there any religious group currently believing in God the Mother, God the Daughter...and why should that be problematic for faith in any event?
But I have some idea that Eve or God has claimed intellectual property rights to what have been popularised in folklore as 'feminine traits'...their wiles, their intuition etc. By the time the naturally slower thinking man "woke up" to the idea of registering these rights, all the best feel-good ones had gone.
So, the blokes re-wrote the Bible along the lines you refer to...to make up lost ground...thousands of years too late?
"...It's worth reading in its entirety, IMO."
I'll check out the link. I'm reminded that somewhere in my childhood, the Holy Spirit was referred to as the Holy Ghost. Many of these Bible changes are benign it seems to me but combined do they change the tone?
In my fruitless search for an off-camera Ravi, I read God provided just enough to give us hope and left out just enough to make us think...or words to that effect.
-- posted by redback
» pink101 - Jeff Begs The Question
In response to Bible101 posted by redback:
.
When we look to an omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent God...it's not clear why we have to divvy Him up into 3 parts for that to make better sense...and do that without diluting the sense of each omni and the global omnis.
.
So, this is where Jeff begs the question about why there is a need for a trinity.
.
But, sometimes, when people have accepted a hierarchical set up to light the path on which they tred, they don't ask questions. In fact, asking questions can be seen as a heretical move toward excommunication. Better keep your mouth shut than question time honored obedience.
..
-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - Tis ...Tis... Mary
In response to Tis ...Tis... This posted by redback:-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - Tis ...Tis... Mary
In response to Tis ...Tis... Mary posted by Migisi:-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - Off topic - Ari is a nut!
In response to Rabbi explains Shekina posted by pink101:-- posted by Migisi
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.