« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
» pink101 - Bad Name Like Czolgosz
In response to What Migisi "senses" posted by Migisi:-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - Tragic Case
In response to Tragic Case posted by BrianTubbs:
.
I think you'd be shocked and outraged to know how much people get away with - even in your own little town. When I first joined the PD, I reviewed archived police files in order to become familiar with the townspeople. Oh, the skeletons in some people's closets, and the cover ups. And on more than one occasion, I was quietly counseled by my chief to look the other way when it came to prominent wealthy businessmen, public officials, and their families. Tickets were torn up (if they were ever issued), spouse/child abuse incident reports were never written or 'misfiled', complaints suddenly dropped with no explanations, etc. It goes on everywhere.
.
Now imagine the magnitude of it at the state, federal, and international level. There's an expression (I'll use family-friendly words)... "Feces floats". The higher one is, the more feces there is.
-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - So ---- ?
In response to Tragic Case posted by Migisi:-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - ASSUMPTIONS
In response to ASSUMPTIONS posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by Migisi
» Migisi - So ---- ?
In response to So ---- ? posted by pink101:-- posted by Migisi
»
Brian Tubbs
- Religious influence on Law and Policy
It think it's absolutely ~necessary~ to reduce (even eliminate) the Bible's influence or authority over our secular laws.
First...this discussion originated from a blog that was written as a critique of Desmond Tutu's RELIGIOUS arguments concerning the death penalty. This discussion then has been in the context of religious or (to the point) Christian and biblical interpretations of the death penalty.
That said...there is a legal or political component to this issue, since Desmond Tutu himself is taking his moral and religious argument against the death penalty into the realm of international law.
Does he have the right to do this? I think it's completely unrealistic to expect that people will leave their faith-based moral convictions at the door to the voting booth. And they shouldn't be expected to do so. An individual voter and/or citizen should be allowed to bring their religious values to bear on policy questions, without restriction.
In Tutu's case, we have a LEADER who is bringing his religious convictions to bear in the policy arena. I think this is just fine. Whether I agree with Tutu or not, he has a right to have his voice heard - and the fact that his voice is informed by religion should not be held against him.
» _Boanerges_ - Religious influence on Law and Policy
In response to Religious influence on Law and Policy posted by BrianTubbs:
It think it's absolutely ~necessary~ to reduce (even eliminate) the Bible's influence or authority over our secular laws.
would you name a few examples that you feel are detrimental to the American culture/society?....
tanks
-- posted by _Boanerges_
»
Brian Tubbs
- Clarification on Wendell's question
Of course, there have been people who have misused and distorted the Bible - and they (the people) have been bad for society.
» _Boanerges_ - Wendell's question was to Mig.. or whoever wants it! :)
In response to Clarification on Wendell's question posted by BrianTubbs:
Hi Brian.. sorry.. yes.. I was responding to Mig.... Obviously I agree with you on this one!....
(and most everything else)...
-- posted by _Boanerges_
» paper_turtle - Brian
.-- posted by paper_turtle
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.