Protestantism

» _Boanerges_ - Same Old Wendell

** all added coments will be in brackets and bold...
** Phil's comments are in italics....
===============================================================
previous post.... current question: (next message is the short version.. this message is the evidence of Phil's question....

Phil: Where in that statement do you mention anything about the video? It's all about me and your statement that I "accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah".

sigh.. do we REALLY have to do this tap dance.. okie, if you insist.... Here is the order of posts......

================================================================
Phil: Being objective means that you will be able to watch this video without having to be upset that someone sees reality differently than do you:
http://www.questionyourreality.com/?utm_...
Go ahead, do it, you might learn something.
-- posted by pink101

--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top74. Aug 16, 2007 6:10 AM
» _Boanerges_ - What is "being objective"?
In response to What is "being objective"? posted by pink101:

yawn......
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top75. Aug 16, 2007 6:25 AM
» pink101 - The Big Dip
In response to What is "being objective"? posted by _Boanerges_:

Phil: I didn't mean for you to check it out [ refers to the video - evidence that I am talking about the video ]. You already know more than can be imagined by most others truly an awesome creature--speshul. Or is that spatial as in the Big Dipper. Or is that just a big dip? You are, for sure, living proof that it takes all kinds. But, I ain't mad at yuh and I still like ya.... But, not too much.
-- posted by pink101

--------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top76. Aug 16, 2007 6:34 AM
» _Boanerges_ - The Big Dip
In response to The Big Dip posted by pink101:

but Phil.. the guy claims [ this is the guy in the video ] to know the absolute truth!... and, you do not object to that?...... (rhetorical) you aint so bad youself. I kinda see you as that old myth.. can't teach an ole dog new tricks.. but alas.. Myth Busters proved that an old dog can be taught new tricks.. oh my.. what is this world coming to!..
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Phil: You haven't had the time to check out the video involved or what it purposes to be or not be truth. But, then, I forget. You know before you observe. Like I just wrote, you are speshul. Golly Jeepers, Wendell, how did you get to be so smart?
Awesome
-- posted by pink101

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top78. Aug 16, 2007 6:49 AM
» _Boanerges_ - The Big Dip Is Awesome
In response to The Big Dip Is Awesome posted by pink101:

Phil: Golly Jeepers, Wendell, how did you get to be so smart?

Smart? Me??? naaa.. haha Discerned is a more realistic explanation of my superior brilliance.... yeah.. thats it.
1Corinthians 1:27: But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top79. Aug 16, 2007 6:54 AM
» pink101 - Let That Stand
In response to The Big Dip Is Awesome posted by _Boanerges_:

Phil: The Pink had posted, "Golly Jeepers, Wendell, how did you get to be so smart?" And, The Wendell responded with, "Smart? Me??? naaa.. haha Discerned is a more realistic explanation of my superior brilliance.... yeah.. thats it... "1Corinthians 1:27 "But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the things which are mighty;"
I'll let that stand.
-- posted by pink101

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top80. Aug 16, 2007 6:58 AM
» _Boanerges_ - "the kaballist is"
In response to The Big Dip Is Awesome posted by pink101:

Phil: You haven't had the time to check out the video involved or what it purposes to be or not be truth.

quoting [ from the video ]....

"so.. a kabbalahist is a person who has studied and learned how to be consciously involved....." Question: Is he declaring the absolute truth according the the revealed word of "Creator"..... He said "we have a lot of stuff to read"....
Hmmm.. Question - what is this "stuff" and from what book[s] does it come from?
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top81. Aug 16, 2007 7:05 AM
» _Boanerges_ - Finally - An observation

The guy in the video is the Joel Olsteen of Kabbalah...
They both sound and talk the same.... Its all just - so - peachy.... again.. it was such a yawn yawn for me..... however, I must admit, the technological part of the presentation was impressive.. Kinda like a slowed down MTV. I guess he feels the need for movement and colorful graphics to help explain his fundamental teachings of Kabbalah. I guess it helps to sell the "lots of stuff to read"....?...
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top82. Aug 16, 2007 7:32 AM
» pink101 - "the kaballist is"
In response to "the kaballist is" posted by _Boanerges_:

Phil: A person who would be objective about your question would check it out and find out. But, then, YOU already know all the answers--why would YOU be objective about anything?
You wouldn't would you!
-- posted by pink101

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top83. Aug 16, 2007 7:44 AM
» _Boanerges_ - "the kaballist is"
In response to "the kaballist is" posted by pink101:

Phil: why would YOU be objective about anything?

Oh.. I am objective... In fact, I have already asked you why you question the absolute truth given from the Bible, but accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah?... as written.. Its not a question of belief.. but in semantics.... How can you declare that the revealed truth as written (Christianity) is any different than the revealed truth as written (Kabbalah). We know what you mean. Its not that.. Its what you say that is not objective....
Example.. (pretend I am you for a moment...) I would say: I do not believe the revealed word of God as written, from the Bible.. (even though it has some wisdom in it).. but, I do accept the revealed word of Creator as written in Kabbalah... - ending my pretending to be the Phil... Now then, obviously you can see the problem here... No?... for example: is there [anyone] that is able to articulate how the [Kabbalah] [as written] obfuscates the message Jesus taught about atonement [as written]? Now. this is an objective question as it relates to statements from you, for absolute truth, in relation to, as written according to the Creator in the Kabbalah faith, as in comparison to as written according to the Creator in the Christian faith.okie.. your turn..
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top84. Aug 16, 2007 9:13 AM
» pink101 - Same Old Wendell
In response to "the kaballist is" posted by _Boanerges_:

Phil: Wendell equivocates, Oh.. I am objective... In fact, I have already asked you why you question the absolute truth given from the Bible, but accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah?... as written.. Ah huh. happy Same old Wendell. Where have you see me write that "[I] accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah"?
Where?
-- posted by pink101
----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top85. Aug 16, 2007 10:53 AM
» _Boanerges_ - Same Old Wendell
In response to Same Old Wendell posted by pink101:

Phil:Where have you see me write that "[I] accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah"?

actually Phil.. as I stated already.. It the guy in the video who stated such. As I said, in this thread, or some other thread, the guy is telling you the absolute truth as written. why do not object as you do with Christianity?.....
That is the question phil....
-- posted by _Boanerges_

----------------------------------------------------------------
Reply Post Top86. Aug 16, 2007 11:06 AM
» pink101 - Same Old Wendell
In response to Same Old Wendell posted by _Boanerges_:

Phil: Here is your statement from the post to which I responded: "Oh.. I am objective... In fact, I have already asked you why you question the absolute truth given from the Bible, but accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah?... as written"..
Where in that statement do you mention anything about the video? It's all about me and your statement that I "accept the absolute truth of Kabbalah". You continuously misrepresent me and that is abusive on your part. You might fool Brian but you sure as heck don't fool anyone else.
-- posted by pink101

--------------------------------------------------------------

my response is in the following message......

-- posted by _Boanerges_