« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
» _Boanerges_ - Dostoyevsky on Predilection
-- posted by _Boanerges_
» _Boanerges_ - Dostoyevsky on Predilection
--Feodor Mikhailovich Dostoyevsky
-- posted by _Boanerges_
» pink101 - Dostoyevsky on Predilection
In response to Dostoyevsky on Predilection posted by _Boanerges_:-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - intellect? or...
In response to intellect? or... posted by pink101:
.
Not only were the colors of the top exciting to a little boy; but, the top had holes it it that caused a musical sound--sort of a humming.
.
Exciting to a little girl as well. I had a few of those whistling tops. Did you ever have the wind-around string-pull tops? They were challenging.
.
Ever watch a top that's stuck in a crevice or depression in the floor? It spins in place until it runs out of energy. Gotta give it a knudge to get it to move on.
-- posted by Migisi
» _Boanerges_ - Phil-ism101
In response to Dostoyevsky on Predilection posted by pink101:The intellectual quotes of the day!
Phil: "Unless you can stop defining my thinking and allow me to speak on my own behalf. Otherwise, why would I ever carry on a three way conversation with you in which you and your ego out vote me at every turn?"
Phil: "You certainly seem bent on the put down. You are adept at it. it must give you some sense of self satisfaction."
Wendell: "which road will he choose"
Nietzsche
'I have done that,' says my memory. 'I cannot have done that' -- says my pride, and remains adamant. At last -- memory yields.
-- posted by _Boanerges_
» pink101 - intellect? or...
In response to intellect? or... posted by Migisi:-- posted by pink101
» _Boanerges_ - rattling loose window panes
In response to intellect? or... posted by pink101:-- posted by _Boanerges_
» redback - substance of the argument was lost
In response to substance of the argument was lost posted by _Boanerges_:
You're a funny fella! ABC
You got me re-reading my posts to see where/how I used the word 'predilection' that would have caused you to "helpfully" define it for me in case I didn't know. Can't find it but then I wear glasses to restrain my powerful vision.
Whenever I've used it, I intend the meaning to include: "is a behavioral predisposition"
BUT you were simply telegraphing your punches so you could use it in a later post.
-- posted by redback
» redback - My Purpose
In response to My Purpose posted by pink101:
"I think the definition of intellectual that you provided is pretty good and I'm using it."
But you introduced the concept of an 'non-intellectual' despite my posts. I don't know what you mean by that.
"...So, who's having an argument..."
Pink...please don't be obtuse about 'argument'...it's hard enough already for me to know if I'm being deliberately misunderstood. Let's call it a 'discussion' instead whereby you highlighted to us how you were put down. I'm assuming you disagreed with the put down.
-- posted by redback
» _Boanerges_ - substance of the argument was lost
In response to substance of the argument was lost posted by redback:
You're a funny fella! ABC
thanx
You got me re-reading my posts to see where/how I used the word 'predilection'
uhm... no.. I used that word. you had nothing to do with it whatsoever....
that would have caused you to "helpfully" define it for me in case I didn't know.
I placed a definition for all... not specifically for you!
Can't find it but then I wear glasses to restrain my powerful vision. ![]()
maybe you might want to put them on now?
Whenever I've used it, I intend the meaning to include: "is a behavioral predisposition"
thats nice.. but.. my responses were directed towards pink.. not you.. even though you did totally ignore my questions (as an aside).. but, you did make passing glance at the link offered!
BUT you were simply telegraphing your punches so you could use it in a later post.
uhmm.. no.. sorry...
-- posted by _Boanerges_
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.