« Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next »
»
Brian Tubbs
- Response to Pink
In an earlier post (and I did read the whole thing, Pink), you wrote: "The Bible came to be seen as the Revealed Word of God in a popular way. Before that, it had been seen almost exclusively as The Good Book and not to be taken literally."
I don't fully agree with this. It's overly simplified. You're right insofar as the theory of divine dictation became very popular - even entrenched in some ways - in fundamentalist circles in the 20th century.
Consequently, many fundamentalist Christians began to see the Bible in the same way that Muslims see the "Sacred Scrolls" given to Muhammad. It's as if the Bible floated down out of heaven and was given to the early church by the angels themselves.
However....I don't believe it's fair to say that mainstream, evangelical Christians prior to the 1800s and 1900s saw the Bible simply as the "Good Book."
Paul's letter to Timothy in which he says that "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God..." was STILL a solid core tenet of mainstream, orthodox Christianity - at least in the Protestant side of the house.
» pink101 - Response to Pink
In response to Response to Pink posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
» HeadZenCards - Response to Brian
In response to Response to Pink posted by BrianTubbs:
If all scripture is given by inspiration of God, why are you afraid to discuss it?
This is a thread about resurrection, not how Christians saw the Bible in this century or that century.
Jesus-As-Written said he would send believers in his resurrection to eternal damnation if they did not do the will of his father, the LORD GOD.
Doesn't the LORD GOD, in your spirit right now, tell you to defend what He did in the OT?
-- posted by HeadZenCards
»
Brian Tubbs
- Response to Pink
I'm not getting these responses - that you call "typical" - out of some script, Pink. Like you, I'm a student of church history. I do have a few clues as to what I'm talking about. I've read the writings of the early church fathers, some of the resolutions of early church councils, and doctrinal treatises throughout the ages. I'm telling you that the doctrine of divine inspiration of the Scriptures has been present throughout the history of the church. It's not a 19th or 20th century novelty. If you think it is, you're just plain wrong about that.
» pink101 - Divine Inspiration?
In response to Response to Pink posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Dictation
» pink101 - Dictation
In response to Dictation posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Dictation
I see your point, but I think it's fair to evaluate and assess Paul's declaration that the Bible is divinely inspired. If you read his letters, he is saying that the Christian church (not just then - but after his death) should be based on the Scriptures. And, it's also clear, that he is expansive in his definition of the Scriptures - he's talking about the doctrines and teachings of the prophets, Jesus, and the apostles (and he knew himself to be an apostle).
» pink101 - Dictation
In response to Dictation posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Down to Earth
Explain "down to earth" in the way you mean it
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.