» pink101 - The Suspension
-- posted by pink101
» paper_turtle - The Suspension
In response to The Suspension posted by pink101:
I saw the headline about this on my home page when I logged in this morning. Other than that, though, I'm totally out of the loop on this one. My one and only exposure to Imus convinced me I didn't want to hear any more--it seemed to me as id he was constantly saying something that shouldn't come from the mouth of any reasonable person. But that's just me.
.
IMHO those who inappropriately spout off at the mouth in the public arena do so deliberately. They may have to apologize. They may be sanctioned in some way. Those things don't really bother them 'cause they've also gotten their message out there.
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
» Migisi - The Suspension
In response to The Suspension posted by paper_turtle:
.
I never cared much for Imus either. I think his show is a snore. Two weeks suspension for his nasty remark isn't punishment for him... it's vacation time. Seems these talk hosts have to do the 'shock jock' thing every so often to test/boost ratings. The publicity mileage Imus is getting for this is amazing. If anyone didn't know who he was before, they'll know him now, ay?
-- posted by Migisi
» pink101 - I Guess
-- posted by pink101
» Migisi - I Guess
In response to I Guess posted by pink101:-- posted by Migisi
» paper_turtle - I Guess
In response to I Guess posted by pink101:
Phil wrote:
In any event, do we really want to be in the censorship business? For example, aren't the words Imus used popular words with some entertainment people? What will we do about them?
.
The words he used *shouldn't* be popular with anyone.
.
I think there's a huge difference between censorship and asking people to speak (behave) responsibly. I don't think freedom of speech necessarily means we have the right to say hateful, inflammatory things--especially over public media where young children might hear them and think its cool.
.
IMHO a *reasonable* person knows that calling someone "a nappy-headed ho" is disrespectful (to day the least). Not to mention that it reflects badly on the person who said it.
.
I just don't understand why people like that get airtime in the first place. Nor do I understand why anyone would want to listen to (what I see as) such garbage day after day. Why pollute your mind and spirit that way?
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
»
Brian Tubbs
- My take
I like what this editorialist wrote about IMUS: "It was ridiculously unacceptable, mean and insensitive. But was it unforgivable?" That's a good question to ask.
» paper_turtle - My take
In response to My take posted by BrianTubbs:
I would be among the first to advocate on behalf of forgiveness. Further, I don't believe any good cause is served by making people into pariahs.
.
Still, from what I have observed, shocks jocks make their livings saying offensive things. If Imus is forgiven, is there any indication he will change his ways?
.
And then again, forgiveness is really more about the person doing the forgiving than the one forgiven. I mean, if Joe Schmo holds a grudge against his neighbor, *Joe* is the one whose spirit is poisoned, not his neighbor.
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
»
Brian Tubbs
- Another sobering twist on all this
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/Miche...
She makes some very good points.
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.