» pink101 - It's Not My Intention
It is not my intention to belittle the teaching work of Jesus and his life; but, it's more than past time for the popular message of the traditional church to be exposed for what it is.-- posted by pink101
» pink101 - Correction--Plus
In response to It's Not My Intention posted by pink101:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Your "Gospel"
For now, let me ask you -- what are your sources? Upon what do you base this history?
» pink101 - Your "Gospel"
In response to Your "Gospel" posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Your Question
Have the popular churches merely re-established the teachings of the priesthood that Jesus came against in order to maintain their control over the people?
This is a loaded question. Depends what you mean by "popular churches." Also depends on WHAT "teachings of the priesthood" you are referring to. I would say that Jesus Himself upheld many of the teachings of the Jewish priesthood. At one point, He said He came to "fulfill" the law, not "abolish" it. Remember that.
Still...have some churches abused the Gospel and/or substituted their own version of it? Yes.
» paper_turtle - It's Not My Intention
In response to It's Not My Intention posted by pink101:
Exactly--what was it that Jesus taught that was so upsetting to the priesthood?
.
IMHO, the short answer:
.
Right relationship with God, to the Jew of Jesus time, was established through adherence to law and ritual. These things require a middle man (or men)--the priesthood. Jesus was saying no middleman was needed. We could all have the same relationship with God that he had. No middle man. Hundreds of priests out of a job. Deprived of power and prestige. No longer having the ear of the Romans. Just plain ordinary people.
.
But of course, being unemployed was not really their biggest concern. Their beliefs were central to their identity. If someone should walk up to you and say that you are NOT Phil, and everything you think you know about yourself and your life is false, you'd be pretty paniced, too. ![]()
.
peace and love,
Paper Turtle
-- posted by paper_turtle
»
Brian Tubbs
- Your Sources
You cite your sources as your own "personal experience" and the Bible. Unless you've personally experienced Jesus, then your personal experiences are not credible or relevant to ascertaining Jesus' message in the 1st century AD. I'm assuming, of course, that you were not there.
So, you must turn to the records of ancient history - the leading record of Jesus' life and teachings being of course the Bible.
Do you accept the New Testament as an accurate record of Jesus' life and teachings? If you don't, then why use it as a source?
» pink101 - Your Question
In response to Your Question posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
» pink101 - Your Question--Okay
In response to Your Question posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- Not avoiding
I'm clarifying your question. Not dodging it. You really are loading it up. Of course, modern mainstream Christian churches have sometimes (I would say often) incorporated elements into Jesus' teachings that, if anything, resemble some of the old Phariseeisms that Jesus warned against. Ironically, I spoke on this TONIGHT at our prayer and Bible study.
However, if you are to look at the BASIC message of Jesus - it's "I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life - no one comes to the Father except through Me." (John 14:6) If that ain't clear enough, go with John 3:16. The central point of Jesus' teaching is that HE is the Messiah - that He is the Son of God come to "seek and to save that which is lost."
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.