Learning to Live Like Jesus

A Review of Dallas Willard's Classic Book on Spiritual Discipline

© Brian Tubbs

Dallas Willard, a renowned scholar and Christian author, says the key to living a fulfilled Christian life is to model the One who Christianity is all about.

Editor's Note: We will resume our series on the evidences for the Christian faith next week.

Dallas Willard’s Spirit of the Disciplines attacks directly what he sees as a fundamental problem with modern Christianity. According to Willard, modern Christians have abandoned the transforming power of their faith, because they have neglected to live in submission and harmony with the One who Christianity is all about.

The “central claim” of Willard's classic book is that Christians can become like Christ by “following [Christ] in the overall style of life he chose for himself” and by “practicing the types of activities he himself practiced in order to remain constantly at home in the fellowship of his Father.”[1] According to Willard, Jesus manifested the following traits and habits in His daily life: solitude, silence, prayer, simple and sacrificial living, intense study and meditation, and service to others.[2] Only in living out these traits and habits, argues Willard, can a believer today experience a vibrant and fulfilled Christian life.

Here are a few concepts from Willard's book:

Live as Jesus Lived

The first premise of Willard’s book echoes the foundational theme of the entire book. We must live as Jesus lived. Willard warns, “To depart from righteousness is to choose a life of crushing burdens, failures, and disappointments, a life caught in the toils of endless problems that are never resolved.”[3]

Of course, most Christians recoil when forced to confront the holy example of Jesus. Willard acknowledges that Jesus’ ways seem “overwhelmingly burdensome” to us, but only because “we do not have the strength we should have.”[4]

The key to acquiring that strength is not an emotional decision to renew our hearts and minds, something many Christians do (and then fall away from). Christian author Richard Foster, a friend of Willard's, explains:

Our ordinary method of dealing with ingrained sin is to launch a frontal attack. We rely on our willpower and determination. Whatever may be the issue for us – anger, fear, bitterness, gluttony, pride, lust, substance abuse – we determine never to do it again; we pray against it, fight against it, set our will against it. But the struggle is all in vain, and we find ourselves once again morally bankrupt or, worse yet, so proud of our external righteousness that 'whitened sepulchers' is a mild description of our condition.[5]

Willard uses an athletic analogy to show the folly of such reasoning. People off the street are not capable of turning in an Olympic performance in some sporting event, whenever the urge seizes them to try. Athletes must work endless hours to hone their bodies and skill sets to demonstrate such prowess on the court or field. Likewise, Christians should not expect to experience victory in Christ without first putting in the time and discipline. It takes a complete, comprehensive commitment that encompasses our whole life. Says Willard, “[I]f we wish to follow Christ…we will have to accept his overall way of life as our way of life totally.”[6]

It Comes Down to the Body

“The human body is the focal point of human existence,” declares Willard.[7] It is how each person interacts with his environment. The body allows us to touch, feel, see, hear, and smell the world around us. It should therefore come as no surprise that the body is essentially how we interact with God, at least at this point in our existence.

Willard dramatically calls attention to the fact that Jesus Christ had a human body. He casts an interesting, contemporary light on the ancient heresy of Docetism. That doctrine held Jesus was fully spiritual, and His physical body was not an actuality. Willard points out that, while this doctrine has been largely debunked, many today still cannot fathom or accept that Jesus had a bona fide human anatomy. According to Willard, this is because “we tend to think of the body and its functions as only a hindrance to our spiritual calling, with no positive role in our redemption or in our participation in the government of God.”[8]

Indeed, for many Christians today, the body is a hindrance. According to Willard, it is true that “our bodies can overwhelm us with their impulses and terrify us with their invulnerabilities.”[9] However, faith in Christ -- the kind seen in the New Testament -- is a “distinctive life force that originates in the impact of God’s word upon the soul…and then exercises a determining influence upon all aspects of our existence.”[10]

Jesus had the same type of human body that we do today, and He bent that body to the Father’s will and used it to fulfill the Father’s purpose. He was not subject to His body, but rather made the body subject to Himself.

We can look to Jesus for inspiration on how we can submit our bodies to the Lord. Perhaps more fundamentally, we can look to our Creator for inspiration concerning our very soul. Willard writes that God, in contrast with the rest of his Creation, imparted “something of himself to an earthen form specially shaped to receive it.”[11] Thus, our living essence stems directly from the “influx of God’s spirit.”[12]

The eminent theologian A.W. Tozer expounded this concept by showing how our humanity is a reflection of God’s nature. Tozer wrote, “God is a person, and in the deep of His mighty nature He thinks, wills, enjoys, feels, loves, desires and suffers as any other person may.”[13] Answering those who argue God’s communication with us is abstract or unknowable, Tozer argues that God “stays by the familiar pattern of [human] personality” in “making Himself known to us.”[14] This is logical, since God is the one who implanted our personality, and that our personality is a reflection of our Creator’s.

Willard brings his case home by linking these two aspects of human nature – body and soul. He argues that the human body “is part of the imago Dei, for it is the vehicle through which we can effectively acquire the limited self-subsistent power we must have to be truly in the image and likeness of God.”[15]

According to Willard, the body “stands at the disposal of our conscious thought, intention, and choice.”[16] Our choices and intentions can follow the impulses of the body, and thus throw God’s purpose for us into disarray, or the body can follow our decisions. Willard is essentially arguing that we have the same choice before us that Adam and Eve did in the Garden. We must reject our human desires and impulses – those that take us away from God – and submit our bodies by conscious decision to God. This is what Paul means in Romans 12:1 when he calls on Christians to “present [their] bodies as living sacrifices.”

Spiritual Submission & Exercise

Willard strongly criticizes the mode of thinking that associates “success” in a religious setting with human feelings. “The preeminence of the ‘feel good’ mentality,” writes Willard, is “what makes it impossible for many people now even to imagine what Paul and his contemporaries” understood about the Christian life.[17]

Willard points out that the church is disturbingly close to the hedonistic mindset of the pagans, in that we often interpret the world around us (as well as our faith) according to our feelings. In contrast, explains Willard, the “thoughtful and religiously devout people of the classical and Hellenistic world, from the Ganges to the Tiber, knew that the mind and body of the human being had to be rigorously disciplined to achieve a decent individual and social existence.”[18]

In the ear of the early church (centuries before television and the Internet), discipline was a common practice of those who wished to reinforce their faith and bring their bodies in subjection to God’s will. In fact, says Willard, “wherever early Christians looked they saw examples of the practice of solitude, fasting, prayer, private study, communal study, worship, and sacrificial service and giving – to mention only some of the more obvious disciplines for spiritual life.”[19]

One of the biggest challenges facing the church today is the rampant materialistic world in which we live, one that fuels our lusts. It is a culture that elevates concepts of “freedom,” “choice,” and “expression” above virtually all others. Says Willard, it is “[a]gainst the crushing social presence of this vision” that we are called to “forsake all and to ‘hate one’s own life also,’” leaving us with a seemingly “incomprehensible” choice.[20] Not surprisingly, Willard spends a great deal of time discussing the concepts of poverty and wealth.

These are just a few of the concepts and principles found within the pages of Willard's book. For those wishing to be inspired and challenged, Dallas Willard's The Spirit of the Disciplines is worth a trip to the bookstore or local library.

________________________________________________________________________

Editor's Note: Since this article is adapted from one of my seminary papers, the footnotes have been preserved from the original.

[1] Dallas Willard, The Spirit of the Disciplines: Understanding How God Changes Lives (San Francisco: Harper Collins, 1988), p. ix

[2] Ibid

[3] Ibid, p. 2

[4] Ibid

[5] Richard J. Foster, The Celebration of Discipline: The Path to Spiritual Growth, 25th Anniversary ed. (San Francisco: HarperCollins, 1998), pp. 4-5

[6] Willard, Spirit of the Disciplines, p. 8

[7] Ibid, p. 29

[8] Ibid, p. 30

[9] Ibid, p. 41

[10] Ibid

[11] Ibid, p. 52

[12] Ibid

[13] A.W. Tozer, The Pursuit of God: The Human Thirst for the Divine (Camp Hill: Christian Publications, 1993), p. 13

[14] Ibid

[15] Willard, Spirit of the Disciplines, p. 53

[16] Ibid

[17] Ibid, p. 99

[18] Ibid

[19] Ibid

[20] Ibid, p. 131


The copyright of the article Learning to Live Like Jesus in Protestantism is owned by Brian Tubbs. Permission to republish Learning to Live Like Jesus must be granted by the author in writing.



Comments
Nov 10, 2006 2:29 PM
Brenda Lane :
Great book, great author! Have you read Hearing God? Very compelling book. He talks about how we talk to God and that's okay.... but as soon as we say God speaks to us, people think we are heading to the looney bin!
Nov 11, 2006 8:33 AM
Pink :
.
Hoping this post isn't taken in the spirit of antagonism, I see this as the <b>same argument</b> made by all the monotheist religionists including Islamics and Jews.
.
Modernism is the outgrowth of civilization in which we were able to break down the teachings of Jesus applying them directly as <b>the</b> values that brought us the enlightenment in the first place. The church was a retrograde force keeping men, women, and children in the dark regarding reality. In his Brothers Karamozov, Fyodor Dostoyevsky gives us the example of the Grand Inquisitor who famously denigrates Jesus for giving human beings the right to free choice and personal responsibility with the ability to possess one on one relationships with God outside the priesthood. This was a significant argument in the church of the day as it should be today. It shouldn't be played down as it is in present day teachings of the church.
.
Actually, the author--portrayed in your article--gives support to the idea that following Jesus is the work of the devoted and churched segments of society. Jesus is sequestered into churchified circles as the possession of people who belong to the inner circles. And, that has almost come to be the way it is. Whereas, Modernism, was well on the way to bringing those messages to everyone--churched or not. Harry Emerson Fosdick, in his famous sermon, 'Shall Fundamentalism Win?", warned against what we're being faced with today.
.
You have organized the subject quite well. Thanks for your good efforts in creating a comprehensive review. But, I wish you had done it as a series of points--one at a time. As it is, discussion is difficult.
.

.
Nov 11, 2006 8:52 AM
Laurie Pawlik-Kienlen :
I haven't read the book, but I am a Christian. I often wonder how Jesus would live today.....I have this 70's hippie image of him in my mind: "Love, peace, and compassion, man. Chill and let people do their thing, dig it?"
-
I also know he got angry and frustrated with people - and he showed his feelings and thoughts, which I love.
-
In this book, did Willard offer practical suggestions on how to deal with people and our own feelings and thoughts, in a Christ-like way?
Nov 11, 2006 8:59 AM
Pink :
.
<i>"n this book, did Willard offer practical suggestions on how to deal with people and our own feelings and thoughts, in a Christ-like way?"</i>
.
Wouldn't the idea be to get into biblical references to what Jesus taught?
.
Matthew 19:13-15 (KJV Liberal Interpretation)

"Then were there brought unto him <b>those with no education regarding religious doctrinology</b>, that he should put his hands on them, and pray: and the disciples rebuked them. But Jesus said, Suffer <b>these ones</b>, and forbid them not, to come unto me: for of such is the kingdom of heaven. And he laid his hands on them, and departed thence."
.
In other words, don't put people out side the circle of God's acceptance just because they don't buy into your educated doctrines?
.
Nov 11, 2006 6:19 PM
Brian Tubbs :
What do you do with this quote of Jesus?

"I am the Way, the Truth, and the Life, no one comes to the Father, except through me."

Sounds kind of exclusive to me. Maybe even "doctrinal."
Nov 12, 2006 5:36 AM
Pink :
.
I think that is easily handled.
.
In a certain sense, it is difficult because of the way it is couched; but, here's the way I see it.
.
Jesus is saying, "I am--the example that I am--is the Way, it is the Truth, It is the Life, It is the atonement with God, <i>THIS</i> is the way to achieve the relationship with God--there is no other way."
.
It is the thing that the author is pushing in the book you reviewed in your most recent paper. To be like Jesus. That's the Way.
.
.
Nov 12, 2006 6:35 AM
Pink :
.
And, to be like Jesus means that the person accepts the idea that they can be at one with God through the inner journey within.
.
Claim it.
.
Nov 14, 2006 4:56 AM
Brother_Jones :
<i>It should therefore come as no surprise that the body is essentially how we interact with God, at least at this point in our existence.</i>


It would seem there should be some agreement about our defective and cold nature. And whether looking upon Christ provides more reasons to be discouraged. If we interact each day with Him and the result is not wisdom, poetry, and virtue, then it is pretty hard to get much out of a nice sunset or a regular poem. It would be a most wonderful test of theology to simply tumble off into discussions of what the actual body of Jesus was and meant. We probably should be warned of the person who wants to be a registered Calvinist or Liberal, because both temperaments have reduced Jesus to a gracious gentleman agitator. Well, perhaps maybe not so much the Calvinist.

i am just an oldtimer for the Lord.
Nov 14, 2006 2:54 PM
Pink :
.
If you read my reply to Cat's first post under Spirituality in the Alternative thread, this post of Brother Jones' expresses what I would consider to be a big problem in personal growth.
.
Nov 14, 2006 5:16 PM
Migisi :
.
<i>...it is pretty hard to get much out of a nice sunset or a regular poem.</i>
.
What a 'regular poem'?
Page:
13 Comments

Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo