Read the article this discussion is about
« Previous 1 2 3 Next »
» pink101 - The Source
-- posted by pink101
»
Brian Tubbs
- The Source
pink, I agree with most of what you've written here. Science and reason have freed many people from superstition and blind dogma. I applaud that.
I also agree with you (and with Messrs. Madison and Jefferson) that, the mysteries of religious faith being what they are, we must recognize that "Almighty God created the mind free." Therefore, we must uphold the right of people to worship God (or gods) in their own way - or not at all.
» pink101 - The Source
In response to The Source posted by BrianTubbs:-- posted by pink101
» EvilChihuahua - Einstein
In response to Einstein posted by BrianTubbs:
I guess you're right. I read a qoute where he said he did believe in a Divine Being, so I guess Agnostic isn't the right word.:)
-- posted by EvilChihuahua
» hawknut - Einstein
In response to Einstein posted by pink101:
"It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly." -Albert Einstein
.
"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." - Albert Einstein
.
"I cannot conceive of a God who rewards and punishes his creatures, or has a will of the type of which we are conscious in ourselves. An individual who should survive his physical death is also beyond my comprehension, nor do I wish it otherwise; such notions are for the fears or absurd egoism of feeble souls. -Albert Einstein (The World as I See It, 1949)
.
"Those who wish to seek out the cause of miracles, and to understand the things of nature as philosophers, and not to stare at them in astonishment like fools, are soon considered heretical and impious, and proclaimed as such by those whom the mob adores as the interpreters of nature and the gods. For these men know that once ignorance is put aside that wonderment would be taken away which is the only means by which their authority is preserved." - Spinoza
-- posted by hawknut
»
Brian Tubbs
- Essentially....
Einstein would have agreed with the basic premise of my article that the universe defies atheist. It is illogical to have an uncaused cosmos. Something or someone is responsible for our being here.
However...I wouldn't take Einstein any further than that. He did NOT believe in the God of the Bible - or anything close to that. He was no Christian. Not even a Theist per se. He was more a Deist in the Enlightenment sense - that is if you can even affix a label to him.
» EvilChihuahua - Essentially....
In response to Essentially.... posted by BrianTubbs:
It is illogical to have an uncaused cosmos.
Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Every High School Science class teaches that.:)
-- posted by EvilChihuahua
« Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.