Protestantism's Continuing Need for Reformation

From Roman Catholicism to Modernism to Postmodernism

Nov 4, 2009 Edwin Vargas

As it approaches its first 500 years, there currently exists within contemporary Protestantism the need for continuing reformation.

The Protestant reformers of the 16th century formulated the Latin axiom "Ecclesia reformata et semper reformanda," (which translated in English means, "The church reformed is always reforming") as a safeguard against the possible deformation of the churches of the Reformation.

The axiom reflects the reformers' acknowledgment of the continuing need for reformation even among Protestants who may tend to either go back to old man-made traditions or innovate an equally man-made religion that deviates from biblical Christianity.

Such was the case of the almost 500 years of the history of Protestantism, the third major branch of the Christian religion that came out of the Reformation of the 16th century.

Protestantism and Roman Catholicism

From the Council of Trent of the 16th century to the Second Vatican Council of the 20th century to the more recent dialogues of a much smaller scale between Roman Catholic priests and theologians and their Protestant counterparts, the Roman Catholic Church have in many ways admitted its own need for reformation and have, in fact. acted upon it.

In light of this, opportunities for compromise with the Church of Rome have been offered to Protestants in the name of Christian unity and cooperative efforts to resist the growing secularization of the West and to advance Christian missions elsewhere in the world.

Not a few Protestant denominations, churches, para-church organizations and individual ministers have opened their doors to such an offer while many others (especially among evangelicals who remain faithful to the basic tenets of the Reformation) rejected it on doctrinal and theological grounds. For these evangelical Protestants, it is as if Luther is being summoned again to appear before the modern Diet of Worms so as to force him to recant.

For in spite of it all, Roman Catholicism still appears to be decidedly unwilling to yield to the battle cry of classical Protestantism - sola Scriptura (by Scripture alone), sola gratia (by grace alone), sola fide (by faith alone), solus Christus (through Christ alone) and soli Deo gloria (glory to God alone). Thus, a great chasm of difference still exists today between the two regardless of all the efforts exerted towards a possible reconciliation.

Protestant Liberalism and Modernism

One of the major accomplishments of the Reformation of the 16th century was that of setting the Western world free from the old religious shackles that forbade preachers, thinkers and inventors of the past to publicize their sentiments, inventions and discoveries. This, however, eventually resulted in the rise of the Enlightenment of the 18th century with its philosophical child called modernism, which until recently has called into question the relevance of faith and religion in the new secular world it has invented for itself.

It must be noted that the last two centuries (i.e., the 19th and the 20th) were largely shaped by the Enlightenment ideals, which was responsible for the birth of Protestant liberalism with its higher biblical criti­cism and the growth of modern secularism.

Surprisingly, a great number of mainline Protestant denominations and seminaries embraced Protestant liberalism and modern secularism and openly challenged the supernatural element of the Christian faith in the academy. This paved the way for the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy of the early 20th century while a new movement within Protestantism known as Neo-Orthodoxy was also on the rise.

While Protestant liberalism has been somewhat neutralized by the recent development of evangelical scholarship that has somewhat managed to maintain classical Protestantism's sola Scriptura principle, the need to defend the integrity of the biblical faith in the contemporary world still remains.

The Contemporary Challenge of Postmodernism

Probably of greater challenge to the Protestant faith today is the emergence of a new way of thinking that has been lately known, for lack of a more appropriate term, as postmodernism. Like a great number of Protestant scholars and ministers who openly embraced Protestant liberalism that came out of the Enlightenment, not a few Protestant theologians and ministers (many of whom are evangelicals) today appear to have embraced postmodern ideas in the name of contemporary relevance.

Having lately branded themselves as post-conservative, post-foundational, open and progressive evangelicals, many of them have adapted the postmodern way of thinking that celebrates radical relativism, despises classical and modern foundationalism, promotes incredulity towards meaning and meta-narratives, and proposes deconstructionism that suspects political motivation in every statement that claims to be authoritatively truthful.

At stake here is classical Protestantism's sola Scriptura principle, the doctrine that defines Holy Scripture to have the final say in matters pertaining to faith and life, as well as its hermeneutical and epistemological implications. Add to it the growing biblical illiteracy even among evangelicals and the apparent theological snobbery among evangelical ministers, and many may therefore conclude that there exists a need for continuing reformation in today's Protestant community.

Sources:

Carson, D. A. The Gagging of God: Christianity Confronts Pluralism. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996.

Noll, Mark. Turning Points: Decisive Moments in the History of Christianity. GrandRapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2000.

Wells, David F. The Courage to Be Protestant: Truth-Lovers, Marketers and Emergents in the Postmodern World. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 2008.

The copyright of the article Protestantism's Continuing Need for Reformation in Protestantism is owned by Edwin Vargas. Permission to republish Protestantism's Continuing Need for Reformation in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.
Protestant Reformation has Led to Evolution, Edgeurged, Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlik
Protestant Reformation has Led to Evolution
   
What do you think about this article?

NOTE: Because you are not a Suite101 member, your comment will be moderated before it is viewable.
post your comment
What is 2+8?

Comments

Nov 4, 2009 9:07 AM
Guest :
The problem is that the Protestant churches you think are headed in the wrong direction believe they are reforming for the good by embracing modernism and postmodernism. With "sola scriptura," they can find a few passages in the Bible and justify their stance. Your interpretation says that this is bad, their interpretation says it is good. You say that relativism is a new event, but look at the thousands of denominations standing on "truth" looking at other denominations are "wrong" or "don't have it quite right."

With the thousands of different interpretations of the Bible, protestants need a way to reconcile the differences between denominations, and even individuals in denominations. They need a way to allow for the "subjective individual truth", denominational and nondenominational "truths" and objective reality to coincide. The only way for this to happen is for them to accept all different "truths" from other denominations while still embracing their own: sola scriptura and self interpretation = relativism. People want to unite the greater Church while holding on to their "own truths" that make them separate in the first place; this makes no sense.

The only way to escape relativism is to have an objective ideal to stand up to, and with 50,000+ and growing denominations, it seems obvious that the Bible taken as final authority seems to be causing disunity rather then unity in Christians. The only way for protestantism to keep intact is to accept each other's differing ideals through relativism. Overall, it is the protestant ideals, theology, philosophy, and "solas" logically lead to all of this disorder including relativism, modernism and postmodernism; someone didn't mess up along the way, they messed up in the beginning.

To say that further reformation is needed, you must first show, essentially prove to the protestants that have their own interpretation, which is the direction to go. People don't or shouldn't reform for the sake of simple change, they have to know what they are striving for. An objective, undeniable truth/authority must be found, or this falling apart of protestantism is bound to continue happening. Protestantism is only united in believing in Jesus, who they all believe different things about, and the Bible, which they all read and interpret differently. These are tattered threads holding together a thin cloth, and unless protestantism finds something real to build on, then it is doomed to fail.
1 Comment: