Suite101

Origins of Christianity

The First Century Beginning of the Religion of Christ

© Brian Tubbs

What started Christianity? Who started Christianity? The beginning of Christianity continues to arouse intense interest and debate today. Getting to the truth.

What was responsible for the beginning of Christianity? What event(s) and/or what people started Christianity? Answering this question requires a careful review of the first century - the century that everyone agrees was the beginning of the Christian religion.

The Rise of Christianity

It is easier to trace the rise and spread of Christianity, than to address the origins of Christianity. The origins of Christianity are explained in the Bible, specifically the New Testament, but critics and skeptics are generally averse to the Bible. More on this later. However, non-biblical sources provide enough information to establish the general time-frame and scope of the rise of Christianity.

Roman historian Cornelius Tacitus (c. A.D. 55-120) wrote that the Emperor Nero, in order to evade charges that he destroyed Rome, "falsely charged with the guilt, and punished with the most exquisite tortures, the persons commonly called Christians, who were hated for their enormities." Tacitus went on to explain that "Christus" was their "founder" and was "put to death by Pontius Pilate." (Annals XV. 44)

This second century passage found in Tacitus' famous Annals bolsters the early Christian tradition that Jesus was put to death by Pilate and it confirms that Christianity had spread to Rome and had attracted imperial attention by the sixth decade of the first century.

The Roman historian Suetonius also wrote of Nero's punishment of the Christians, whom he described as a "class of men given to a new and mischievous superstition." (Lives of the Caesars, 26.2)

Suetonius, in fact, had the Christians in Rome even earlier than Nero's time. He explained that the Jews in Rome were "making constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus" and were therefore expelled from the city. (Life of Claudius 25.4). This event, which took place in A.D. 49, is likely the same event described in Acts 18:2.

Other non-biblical references to Jesus and/or his followers include letters and documents written by Lucian, a Greek satirist; Pliny the Younger, the Roman governor of Bithynia in Asia Minor; Mara Bar-Serapion, a Syrian philosopher; Josephus, the Jewish historian; and the Jewish Talmud. These sources all confirm the rise and spread of Christianity in the first century.

The Writing of the New Testament

Many refuse to grant the writings of the Bible the same level of respect given to other documents of antiquity. To these critics, if it's in the Bible, it's automatically suspect. Such a dismissal is academically invalid, since the writings of the Bible are at least writings collected and contained in an ancient religious book. Accordingly, they warrant the same scholarly standards of evaluation and analysis as any other ancient document.

What does an academic, scholarly analysis of the New Testament provide? The answer is quite a lot -- too much for this article. However, one of the more significant facts established by the New Testament (the part of the Bible most in focus here) is the time frame for Christianity's expansion.

The writings of the New Testament contain portions of early creeds recited by first century Christians. Many of these creeds, such as the one found in I Corinthians 15, have been dated to the third or fourth decades of the first century.

The New Testament books themselves were written in the first century (though a few scholars put a small number of the New Testament writings into the early second century). Renowned biblical archaeologist William Foxwell Albright declares: "We can already say emphatically that there is no longer any solid basis for dating any book of the New Testament after about A.D. 80."

These books contain the most information about the life of Jesus, his ministry and teachings, and of course his death and reported resurrection. What's more, the New Testament provides the best overview of the history of the early church and contains the writings of its most effective missionaries, including and perhaps especially the Jewish convert named Paul.

Who Was Jesus?

The documentary records of the first century (both Christian and non-Christian) confirm that Christianity began in the first century and rapidly spread throughout the Graeco-Roman world, reaching the capital city of Rome by at least the end of the fourth decade.

So, how did Christianity start? Some critics contend that Christianity arose from embittered Palestinian Jews seeking to establish a new social order. Others claim that Christianity was inspired by pagan religions, such as Mithraism. Still others say that it was a dizzying array of beliefs, traditions, and rituals cobbled together by Constantine at the Council of Nicaea. Is it possible to get to the truth?

The key to the origin of Christianity is a man. Who was Jesus? Was he real? And if so, who was he and how did he become the founder of Christianity? To answer those questions and to explore more on this topic, consider the following sources:

The Evidence for Christianity: Historical Evidences for the Christian Faith by Josh McDowell (Thomas Nelson, 2002)

The Case for the Real Jesus by Lee Strobel (Zondervan, 2007)


The copyright of the article Origins of Christianity in Protestantism is owned by Brian Tubbs. Permission to republish Origins of Christianity in print or online must be granted by the author in writing.



Comments
May 26, 2008 9:02 AM
Pink :
I thought you would be in "Old Virginny" this weekend.
.
http://www.50states.com/midi/virginia.mid
.
Why did Christianity take off? What made it relevant in the lifes of the people of the day when its origins were still fresh?
.
May 26, 2008 3:47 PM
Pink :
For those readers not familiar with this beautiful old song we used to sing in grade school back in the 1930s in Michigan, here is the lyrics. It is now the State Song of Virginia:
Carry Me back to Old Virginny
Written by James Bland

Carry me back to old Virginny,
There's where the cotton and the corn and tatoes grow,
There's where the birds warble sweet in the springtime,
There's where the old darke'ys heart am long'd to go,
There's where I labored so hard for old massa,
Day after day in the field of yellow corn,
No place on earth do I love more sincerely
Than old Virginny, the state where I was born.

CHORUS

Carry me back to old Virginny,
There's where the cotton and the corn and tatoes grow,
There's where the birds warble sweet in the springtime,
There's where this old darkey's heart am long'd to go.

Carry me back to old Virginny,
There let me live 'till I wither and decay,
Long by the old Dismal Swamp have I wandered,
There's where this old darke'ys life will pass away.
Massa and missis have long gone before me,
Soon we will meet on that bright and golden shore,
There we'll be happy and free from all sorrow,
There's where we'll meet and we'll never part no more.

.
A by gone era we would do well to recapture.
.
May 28, 2008 10:07 AM
Migisi :
Hi Pink and Bri. Just popped in to see how the new system is coming along. Sigh. I'm all for upgrading, but I hope they make it more user friendly.

I guess for now, I'll just pick the most recent article and use that to chat about whatever with you guys. How's 'bout that?

Hope you both had a good Memorial Day. I wanna thank you both for your service to our country.






May 29, 2008 6:29 AM
Pink :
This "New" system is a form of censorship as far as I can see.
.
Brian's recent comment in his Blog article~~FAITH and REASON~~is a good example in that he isn't allowing any response. Here is his statement, "In a recent discussion on the resurrection of Jesus, one of the participants has continued to caricature my views as based on 'medieval' reasoning and a faith-based 'belief in the authority of the Bible.'"
.
Medieval reasoning was based on the proposition that truth was issued by authority and not discovered in nature. Whereas Enlightenment reasoning begins with doubt.
.
To issue a response and to not activate the "add a comment" feature seems to be in complete agreement with medieval reasoning. That way of doing business when it came to truth was the main feature of medieval education based, in part, on Romans, chapter 13.
.
Other than that, I guess I don't understand Suite101 management's purpose in shutting down discussion.
.
May 29, 2008 10:30 AM
Migisi :
Pink wrote: <i>To issue a response and to not activate the "add a comment" feature seems to be...</i>

Unfair not to allow a reply.

<i>Other than that, I guess I don't understand Suite101 management's purpose in shutting down discussion.</i>

Was it Suite that shut it down, or Brian?

I notice there's no edit feature either. Yu'l hav to poot up wit my bad speling and gramar, cuz I hav no way to corekt it wons its posted.
May 29, 2008 2:48 PM
Pink :
Migisi asks, "Was it Suite that shut [the add a comment line to the FAITH and REASON blob] down, or Brian?"
.
Brian, at first, explained that it was the prerogative of the author to add or omit the "Add A Comment" feature; but, he has edited his post to read, "As for blogs...the comment feature will be added shortly. Right now, you can't make a comment to a blog post, but that will be changing soon."
.
So, what is the difference between a "Blog Post" and an "Article" like the one we are responding to here?
.

May 30, 2008 5:26 AM
Pink :
RESPONDING TO ARTICLES~~
.
Let me say that Brian's articles and bogs will remain practically meaningless if participants do not respond to them.
.
Who wants to go to an article or blog post to read some clerical statement of "absolute truth" where no comments are made?
.
Huh?
.
Who?
.
May 30, 2008 6:46 AM
Pink :
Absolutists do not like dissent.
.
May 30, 2008 10:31 PM
Brian Tubbs :
Pink, I am not squelching dissent. The blog posts and the articles are processed differently (technically speaking). Separate screens and functions. For whatever reason, comments are enabled (at the author's discretion) for ARTICLES and not currently possible for blog posts.

And, one more time...so we're clear...I, Brian Tubbs, had NOTHING to do with these changes. Nada. Nothing. Zilch. So, please do not associate me with "absolutists" who do not like "dissent." I've done NOTHING to suppress dissent.
May 31, 2008 5:16 AM
Pink :
I didn't think you had anything to do with the changes.
.
Suite management has been doing weird things for a long time.
.
I don't think you try to squelch dissent.
.
I do think your scholastic style is medieval.
.

May 31, 2008 9:47 AM
Migisi :
Pink wrote: "Suite management has been doing weird things for a long time."

When Suite closed the General Forum, robust participation dropped to a handful, and now it's down to you and Brian (I don't visit as much nowadays). I don't think we could ever reply to 'blogs', but at least we could start an independent thread if we wished to comment on one. Now that's gone too. And so are the editing after posting, bolding and italicizing, and the smiley/sad face features.

Ah well, there's nothing constant in life except change.

Jun 1, 2008 6:46 AM
Pink :
The attempts to force participation along the lines of articles and blogs created by site officialdom is ridiculous.
.
Two things were good about Suite101's site. 1. The layout style of the discussion and 2. the participation by a variety of people from far and wide.
.
Both of those things have been squelched by the management.
.
Other than that, what we have now is a sorry copy of what is well established and available all over the 'Net.
.
Jun 1, 2008 6:15 PM
Pink :
Maybe we should investigate the idea of Medieval Scholasticism.
.
Yah think?
Jun 2, 2008 2:14 PM
Pink :
Just for the fun of it, you can go to this site, http://americansociety-discussion.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-we-ascertain-truth.html
.
Some nut has opened a blog on Medieval Scholasticism there.

Jun 4, 2008 5:21 AM
:
Hey guys,
Watching the Hillary campaign slowly deteriorate is like watching this site over the last couple years. Except I'm not so sad to see Hillary fail to get the Dem nod. Oh well. Best to my old friends, sorry I haven't kept up lately. Mayhaps there's some other good posting site?
Jun 4, 2008 5:26 AM
Pink :
.
http://americansociety-discussion.blogspot.com/2008/06/how-we-ascertain-truth.html
.
Jun 4, 2008 8:56 AM
Migisi :
It says there are 16 comments, but only 10 are displayed. Were the rest deleted? No page box to click anymore.
17 Comments


Post this Article to facebook Add this Article to del.icio.us! Digg this Article furl this Article Add this Article to Reddit Add this Article to Technorati Add this Article to Newsvine Add this Article to Windows Live Add this Article to Yahoo Add this Article to StumbleUpon Add this Article to BlinkLists Add this Article to Spurl Add this Article to Google Add this Article to Ask Add this Article to Squidoo